Taiwan Security Monitor

Creeping Closer: Timeline and Analysis of the Justice Mission-2025 Joint Exercise

Authors: Noah Reed, Ethan Connell, & Jonathan Walberg


From December 29th to 31st, the Eastern Theater Command (ETC) of the Peopleโ€™s Liberation Army (PLA) held exercise โ€œJustice Mission-2025โ€ (ๆญฃไน‰ไฝฟๅ‘ฝ-2025) in the waters and airspace surrounding Taiwan. The drills, described by Chinese state media as a response in part to the United Statesโ€™ US$11.1 billion arms package to Taiwan announced two weeks prior,[i] were the 5th and most significant round of joint exercises around Taiwan since Nancy Pelosiโ€™s 2022 visit to Taiwan.[ii]

While following the overall thematic and operational rhythm established in prior exercises following 2022, Justice Mission-2025 also produced several firsts. These include the closest live-fire exercise to date, and the first use of a Type 075 amphibious assault ship in a joint-exercise. The exercise also featured a notable increase in attention devoted to psychological warfare and political messaging elements.

As has been the case in all past joint exercises, Justice Mission-2025 was described first and foremost as a โ€œSerious warning to โ€˜Taiwan Independenceโ€™ separatist forces and external interferenceโ€ by the Peopleโ€™s Republic of Chinaโ€™s (PRC) Ministry of National Defense (MND). (ๅฏนโ€œๅฐ็‹ฌโ€ๅˆ†่ฃ‚ๅŠฟๅŠ›ไธŽๅค–้ƒจๅŠฟๅŠ›ๅนฒๆถ‰็š„ไธฅ้‡่ญฆๅ‘Š.)[iii]

Overall, Justice Mission-2025 fulfilled a dual mandate. First, it provided relevant operational experience for the PLA and China Coast Guard (CCG), something represented in the growing scale of joint-exercises since 2022 as the PLA expands in reach and scale. Second, it sent a signal of frustration over the state of cross-Strait relations to Washington, while also attempting to place the blame for the deterioration of those relations on the incumbent Democratic Progressive Party and President Lai Ching-te.

Operational Sequencing of the Exercise

Day 1 Overview: Overall, Taiwanโ€™s MND detected 89 aircraft and 28 naval vessels, split into 15 PLAN vessels and 13 CCG vessels, operating around Taiwan during day one of the Justice Mission-2025 exercise. The day was marked by several operational themes, including:

  1. A focus on airpower, including long-range air superiority, airspace encirclement, and airborne early warning.
  2. A focus on sea-air coordination, especially as it relates to the detection and destruction of surface and sub-surface vessels.
  3. A focus on the airspace and waters east of Taiwan, consistent with an overall focus on deterring โ€œexternal interference.โ€

29 December (All Times Local)

0730-0800: Spokesperson of the ETC of the Peopleโ€™s Liberation Army, Senior Colonel Shi Yi, announced that it had dispatched its Army, Navy, Air Force, and Rocket Force troops to conduct joint military drills codenamed โ€œJustice Mission 2025โ€ in the airspace and waters surrounding Taiwan.[iv]

Alongside this announcement was the release of a navigation warning with five prohibited entry zones within which live-fire exercises would take place the following day. Later in the day, the PRCโ€™s Maritime Safety Administration (MSA) published two additional warning zones. The ETC later added an eighth zone to the east of Taiwan over radio, although they never announced it publicly via navigational warning.

Five of the eight declared zones violated Taiwanโ€™s territorial waters. Zone fourโ€™s boundary ran less than five nautical miles from Taiwanโ€™s southern coast. However, at no point did Chinese vessels cross into Taiwanโ€™s territorial waters. All Chinese vessels operated in the area between Taiwanโ€™s contiguous and territorial waters.

Notably, Taiwanโ€™s Ministry of National Defense (MND) disclosed that its intelligence agencies had noticed irregular activity and possible preparation several days prior to the start of โ€œJustice Mission,โ€ which contrasts with a claim by Chinese state media that the operation represented a โ€œcold startโ€ or โ€œsnap exercise.โ€[v]

0800-0930: Approximately one hour after announcing the exercise, the PLAโ€™s ETC claimed that it had mobilized fighters, bombers, unmanned aerial vehicles, and long-range rocket units to strikes on simulated mobile ground targets in the โ€œmiddle areasโ€ of the Taiwan Strait.[vi] Taiwanโ€™s MND did not report any rocket impacts in the Taiwan Strait during this time, and the ETC did not release footage of these strikes as it did on the next day.

0930-1130: At 1000, Taiwanโ€™s MND released a statement condemning the exercise and announced the beginning of rapid response exercises and a state of high alert.[vii] One hour later, the ETC announced maritime live-fire training to the north and southwest of Taiwan, employing destroyers, frigates, fighters, bombers, and unmanned aerial vehicles. The training focused on hunting and neutralizing targets, simulated ground strikes, and live firing against targets.[viii]

An article in the PLA Daily newspaper published on the morning of the 30th identified several of the ships involved in this portion of the exercise, including the Baoyi, Quzhou, and Taiyuan ship formations.[ix]

1130-1230: At 1200, the ETC announced that it had dispatched destroyers, frigates, fighters, and bombers to conduct anti-submarine and sea-air coordination exercises to the east of the Taiwan Strait.[x] The ETC released initial footage from the exercise, showcasing elements of all involved services at around this time.

On the heels of this announcement, the CCG announced that it was carrying out โ€œcomprehensive law-enforcement patrolsโ€ in waters surrounding Taiwan and the areas near the Matsu and Wuqiu islands. Taiwanโ€™s Coast Guard Administration (CGA) claimed that it had detected increased CCG activity several hours prior to the CCGโ€™s official announcement.[xi]

MarineTraffic Automatic Identification System (AIS) data, which shows the last pinged location of certain vessels, confirmed this claim, as several CCG vessels, including CCG 1303 and 1302, were already observed operating north of Taiwan by 12:00.[xii] TSM researchers subsequently confirmed that CCG vessels 14609, 14606, 1302, 1306, 2203, 2204, 1303, 1303, 1302 also participated in these patrols on the 29th.[xiii]

Poster showcasing involved CCG vessels published by Chinaโ€™s Coast Guard Weibo Account

1230-1630: At 1500, the ETC conducted regional patrol, information support, and aerial confrontation drills using airborne early warning aircraft, fighters, and electronic warfare aircraft to the southwest of Taiwan.[xiv] An hour later, the ETC dispatched bomber task forces to conduct far-seas combat readiness patrols east of Taiwan, focusing on long-distance joint precision strikes in remote areas.[xv]

1600-0000: At 1700, the ETC reported that a Type 075 amphibious assault ship and several accompanying vessels were operating Southeast of Taiwan. According to state media, this represented the first time the PLA had deployed a Type 075 around Taiwan during a joint exercise.[xvi]

Finally, at 2000, the ETC released footage claiming to show a TB-001 UAV from the PLA Rocket Forceโ€™s 61st Base operating close to Taipei City near the Tamsui River outlet.[xvii] Taiwanโ€™s MND has disputed the authenticity of the footage, reporting that no drone entered Taiwanโ€™s airspace during the exercise.

Image circulated by PRC State Media claiming to show a UAVโ€™s photo capture of New Taipei

30 December (All Times Local)

Day 2 Summary: Taiwanโ€™s MND reported 71 aircraft, 17 PLAN vessels, and 15 CCG vessels around Taiwan by 1500 on day 2 of Justice Mission-2025. In addition, Taiwan detected a total of 27 rocket impacts in the waters north and south of Taiwan over this period.

The second day of the drills focused on blockade operations and targeted strikes, marking the closest live-fire drills around Taiwan on record.

0730-0800: The second day of Justice Mission-2025 began at 0800, when the ETC announced that fighters, bombers, frigates, and destroyers were conducting integrated blockade and control operations, to include identification, warning, and anti-air and submarine operations, to the north and south of Taiwan.[xviii]

0800-1200: At 0900, the ETC initiated the first of two rounds of live-fire long-range rocket drills in exercise zone 1. According to Taiwanโ€™s MND, PHL-16 self-propelled Multiple Rocket Launcher Systems (MLRS) from the 72nd Group Armyโ€™s Rocket Artillery Brigade in Pingtan County, Fujian, fired at least 17 rockets into this zone.[xix]

1200-0000: At approximately 1300, PHL-16 MLRS from the 73rd Group Armyโ€™s Rocket Artillery Brigade in Shishi, Fujian, initiated a second round of live-fire long-range rocket drills. [xx] These launches targeted Zone 3 to the south of Taiwan. Taiwanโ€™s MND reported 10 rocket impacts in the exercise. [xxi]Taiwanese media outlets reported that ten rockets from the two sets of launches landed within Taiwanโ€™s contiguous waters zone, marking the closest ever recorded impacts during a live-fire exercise.[xxii]

The remainder of Day 2 was mostly devoted to a series of poster and video releases by the Eastern Theater Command and China Coast Guard, who continued their โ€œcomprehensive law enforcement patrolsโ€ into the second day.

31 December (All Times Local)

The ETC announced the end of the exercise at 16:00 on December 31. It is not clear why the ETC delayed announcing the end of the exercise until 31 December, as all exercise warning zones had already expired the day prior. Furthermore, MarineTraffic AIS data showed that China Coast Guard vessels had begun pulling back from the waters around Taiwan earlier in the day.[xxiii] In prior exercises, the ETC usually announced the end of exercises on the last day of heavy activity.

Notably, the ETC had released no prior exercise updates on the 31st, and Taiwanโ€™s MND reported only 1 aircraft violating the Air Defense Identification Zone (ADIZ) over this period.[xxiv]

Justice Mission-2025โ€™s Propaganda Dimensions

Beijing deliberately crafted the messaging and reporting surrounding Justice Mission to frame the exercise as a โ€œstern warningโ€ to Taipei and its international supporters. Official statements and state media reports consistently emphasized the operation as a โ€œlegitimate and necessary actionโ€ to defend the PRCโ€™s sovereignty and promote unification.[xxv] PRC spokespeople explicitly connected the drills to Washingtonโ€™s mid-December approval of a record US$11.1 billion arms package for Taiwan, framing the exercise as a direct โ€œpunitive and deterrent actionโ€ in response.[xxvi] Foreign Ministry officials accused Taiwanโ€™s ruling party of transforming the island into a โ€œpowder kegโ€ through military expansion and arms acquisitions, cautioning that U.S. efforts to โ€œarm Taiwan to contain Chinaโ€ would โ€œonly embolden the separatists and push the Taiwan Strait closer to the peril of armed conflict.โ€[xxvii] This external context was central to PRC rhetoric, enabling Beijing to justify the drills as compelled by hostile provocations and reinforcing its narrative that Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) leaders are โ€œprovocateursโ€ responsible for escalating tensions.

Official posters and slogans likewise adopted an overtly threatening tone, emphasizing the PLAโ€™s capacity to isolate and strike Taiwan. PLA media accounts disseminated a series of dramatic infographics and posters suggesting that Taiwan would be defenseless in a military confrontation. For instance, one poster depicted PLA forces severing Taiwanโ€™s supply lines, accompanied by the caption โ€œSupply cut off โ€“ how can [you] pursue โ€˜independenceโ€™?โ€ while another highlighted the โ€œoverwhelming power gapโ€ between the PRC and Taiwan, with the challenge, โ€œHow can you seek โ€˜independenceโ€™ [against such odds]?โ€[xxviii]ย These visuals, often given titles like โ€œHammer of Justiceโ€ or โ€œArrow of Justice,โ€ portrayed missiles targeting the island and blockade operations restricting access to Taiwanโ€™s ports.[xxix]

The central message was that Beijingโ€™s military strength serves as a tool of righteous punishment, capable of simultaneously defeating โ€œTaiwan independenceโ€ forces and deterring external intervention from the United States. One โ€œArrow of Justiceโ€ poster went further by depicting a missile and volleys of arrows plunging into Taiwan itself, with lurid green โ€œwormโ€ figures, a common stand-in for the DPP/โ€œGreen camp,โ€ splattered across the island, visually signaling not just blockade or deterrence but the targeted eradication of โ€œinternalโ€ pro-independence actors. Paired with the slogan โ€œๅ…งๆŽงๅค–้ฆณโ€ (โ€œcontrol internally, charge outwardโ€), the imagery suggested Beijing could simultaneously suppress โ€œTaiwan independenceโ€ forces on the island while striking outward to deter or punish external intervention.

 PRC civilian agencies also contributed to the propaganda campaign. For example, the China Coast Guard promoted its involvement in the drills through graphics of patrol ships encircling Taiwan and slogans such as โ€œTaiwan is Chinaโ€™s inherent territory,โ€ thereby reinforcing the exerciseโ€™s dual military and law-enforcement objectives in asserting sovereignty.[xxx]

Initial announcement poster for Justice Mission 2025. The poster depicts the PRC as two shields emblazoned with the Great Wall, defending Taiwan from the external influence of American arms sales and military platforms.

Official statements from Beijingโ€™s civilian and military representatives reinforced these themes. The State Councilโ€™s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO) described the Justice Mission maneuvers as a โ€œsolemn warningโ€ to separatists and foreign actors, calling them a โ€œnecessary and just measureโ€ to protect Chinaโ€™s territorial integrity.[xxxi] TAO spokespersons accused the DPP administration of โ€œrecklessly colluding with external forcesโ€ and pursuing โ€œindependenceโ€ at the expense of Taiwanโ€™s security and welfare. They cited President Lai Ching-teโ€™s governmentโ€™s acceptance of U.S. arms and support, claiming this โ€œmilitarizationโ€ was leading the island down a โ€œdangerous path.โ€[xxxii] Beijing repeatedly stated that its actions targeted โ€œTaiwan independenceโ€ elements and their supporters, not the general population. TAO officials emphasized that โ€œpeople on both sides of the Strait are one family,โ€ and that PLA operations were directed only at separatist provocations and were โ€œnot [aimed] at the Taiwan compatriots.โ€[xxxiii] By combining explicit threats with appeals to โ€œTaiwanese compatriots,โ€ the PRCโ€™s narrative sought to weaken support for the DPP by portraying Beijingโ€™s actions as protective and just. At the same time, severe rhetoric toward external actors, warning that any foreign interference would โ€œdash itself to pieces against the steel Great Wall of the PLA,โ€ highlighted the exercisesโ€™ additional audience: the United States and other regional observers.[xxxiv] Through coordinated statements and vivid propaganda, the PRC presented Justice Mission-2025 as a lawful and necessary operation to punish separatism, deter U.S. โ€œmeddling,โ€ and position itself as the purported defender of national sovereignty and guarantor of peace in the Taiwan Strait.

Regional and US Responses

While US President Donald Trump said that he โ€œwasnโ€™t worriedโ€ about Justice Mission-2025,[xxxv] and that his relationship with President Xi remains strong, the State Department called for China to โ€œcease military pressure,โ€ and that Beijingโ€™s actions spiked tensions. Trumpโ€™s comment was widely interpreted in divergent ways: by critics as dismissive or inattentive, and by supporters as a signal of confidence meant to convey U.S. military and political dominance. In this sense, the remark functioned less as an assessment of the exercises themselves than as a performative signal aimed at preserving maneuver space and projecting toughness. Following the conclusion of the exercises, on January 1, State Department spokesperson Tommy Pigott reaffirmed the United Statesโ€™ policy of supporting peace and stability across the Strait, opposing unilateral changes to the status quo.[xxxvi]

On December 30th, South Koreaโ€™s Foreign Ministry released a similar statement, calling for โ€œdialogue and cooperation.โ€[xxxvii] On December 31st, Japan expressed concern over the exercises, with Foreign Ministry press Secretary Kitamura emphasizing that โ€œpeace and stability across the Taiwan Strait are important for the international community as a whole.โ€[xxxviii] The same day in Manila, Philippine Defense Secretary Teodoro expressed deep concern, adding that Chinaโ€™s coercion against Taiwan has implications โ€œbeyond the regionโ€ and risks stability across the continent.[xxxix] Also making statements expressing concern on New Yearโ€™s Eve were Australia and New Zealand,[xl] with Germany,[xli] the United Kingdom,[xlii] and France making announcements the day before.[xliii] Notably, Taiwanโ€™s Foreign Ministry thanked each of these countries for their statements condemning the exercises, including Japan, but left off the United States from the message.[xliv]

Conclusion

Justice Missionโ€“2025 underscored that Beijing is trying to institutionalize a coercive โ€œdealโ€ around Taiwan: headline joint exercises are increasingly treated as a conditional punishment for specific U.S. and Taiwanese actions, while day-to-day gray-zone pressure continues regardless. The exercise showed ongoing improvements in joint fires, seaโ€“air coordination, and geographically dispersed operations, especially east of Taiwan to deter external intervention from the US. The ambiguous third day of the exercise and subdued final phase created uncertainty surrounding the intentions and overall sequence of the exercise.

The number of aircraft and naval vessels involved during the exercise naturally grew from prior iterations, as should be expected with an increasingly large and coordinated force. December 29 saw the second-largest single-day ADIZ violation by PLA aircraft on record, with the period from December 29-30 representing the largest overall violation period. Notably, the exercise did not feature an aircraft carrier, instead opting to involve a Type 075 amphibious assault vessel for the first time.

Visualization of ADIZ violations during a major exercise, via Ben Lewis and PLATracker

The exercises featured Beijingโ€™s increasing use of coordinated propaganda, law enforcement involvement, and symbolic imagery alongside military pressure. By linking the drills to U.S. arms sales and rationalizing them as โ€œjustโ€ and โ€œdefensive,โ€ the PRC aimed to shift blame for escalation to Taipei and Washington while normalizing the PLAโ€™s presence near Taiwan. Regional reactions, which were mostly expressions of concern, underscore the gap between Beijingโ€™s claims of legitimacy and the international communityโ€™s view of destabilization. Overall, the exercise suggests that future PLA operations around Taiwan will be frequent, multi-domain, and information-driven, focusing on eroding confidence and complicating decision-making rather than preparing for immediate invasion.


[i] Global Times. โ€˜Justice Mission 2025โ€™ drills serious warning to โ€˜Taiwan independenceโ€™ separatist forces and foreign interference, MND on comment drills target US arms sale to Taiwan. December 29th, 2025. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202512/1351803.shtml

[ii] Prior joint-exercises include: 2023 โ€Joint Swordโ€, Joint Sword 2024-A, Joint Sword 2024-B, and Strait Thunder 2025-A.

[iii] PRC Ministry of National Defense. ๅ›ฝ้˜ฒ้ƒจๆ–ฐ้—ปๅ‘่จ€ไบบๅผ ๆ™“ๅˆšๅฐฑไธœ้ƒจๆˆ˜ๅŒบโ€œๆญฃไน‰ไฝฟๅ‘ฝ-2025โ€ๆผ”ไน ็ญ”่ฎฐ่€…้—ฎ. December 29th,2025.

[iv] PRC Ministry of National Defense. ไธœ้ƒจๆˆ˜ๅŒบๆตท็ฉบๅ…ตๅŠ›ๅฎžๆ–ฝ็Žฏๅฐๅฒ›ๆˆ˜ๅค‡่ญฆๅทก. December 29th, 2025.

[v] Guo Yuandan and Liu Xuanzun. Expert interprets PLA’s ‘Justice Mission 2025’ drill areas as media on Taiwan island describes exercises as ‘sudden’. Global Times. December 29th, 2025. https://www.globaltimes.cn/page/202512/1351721.shtml, Taiwan Military News Agency. ไธญๅ…ฑ็‰‡้ขๅฎฃๅธƒ่ปๆผ”ใ€€ๅœ‹้˜ฒ้ƒจ๏ผš็ถฟๅฏ†ๆŽŒๆก็ขบไฟๅœ‹ๅฎถๅฎ‰ๅ…จ. December 29th, 2025. https://www.mnd.gov.tw/news/mnd/85591

[vi] PRC Ministry of National Defense. ไธœ้ƒจๆˆ˜ๅŒบไฝๅฐๆนพๆตทๅณกไธญ้ƒจๆตท็ฉบๅŸŸๅผ€ๅฑ•ๅฏน้™†ๆœบๅŠจ็›ฎๆ ‡ๆ‰“ๅ‡ปๆผ”็ปƒ. December 29th, 2025.

[vii] ROC Ministry of National Defense. https://x.com/MoNDefense/status/2005460859901051243. December 29th, 2025.

[viii] PRC Ministry of National Defense.  ไธœ้ƒจๆˆ˜ๅŒบไฝๅฐๅฒ›ๅŒ—้ƒจใ€่ฅฟๅ—ๆตท็ฉบๅŸŸๅผ€ๅฑ•ๅฏนๆตทๅฎžๅผนๅฐ„ๅ‡ป็ญ‰็ง‘็›ฎ่ฎญ็ปƒ. December 29th, 2025.

[ix] Songโ€™s Defense Watch. https://x.com/songs349/status/2005953998604623997. December 30th, 2025., PLA Daily. ไธœ้ƒจๆˆ˜ๅŒบไฝๅฐๅฒ›ๅ‘จ่พนๅผ€ๅฑ•โ€œๆญฃไน‰ไฝฟๅ‘ฝ-2025โ€ๆผ”ไน . Pg 1. December 30th, 2025.

[x] PRC Ministry of National Defense. ไธœ้ƒจๆˆ˜ๅŒบไฝๅฐๅฒ›ไปฅไธœๆตท็ฉบๅŸŸๅผ€ๅฑ•ๅฏนๆตท็ชๅ‡ปใ€ๅŒบๅŸŸๅˆถ็ฉบใ€ๆœๆฝœๅๆฝœ็ญ‰็ง‘็›ฎๆผ”็ปƒ. December 29th, 2025.

[xi] Jaime Ocon. https://x.com/JaimeOcon1/status/2005475439108833748.December 29th, 2025.

[xii] Taiwan Security Monitor. https://x.com/TaiwanMonitor/status/2005499477323374881.December 29th, 2025.

[xiii] Taiwan Security Monitor. https://x.com/TaiwanMonitor/status/2005569169895366874. December 29th, 2025.

[xiv] PLA Eastern Theater Command Weibo. ไธœ้ƒจๆˆ˜ๅŒบไฝๅฐๅฒ›่ฅฟๅ—็ฉบๅŸŸๅผ€ๅฑ•ๅŒบๅŸŸๅทก้€ปใ€็ฉบไธญๅฏนๆŠ—ใ€ไฟกๆฏๆ”ฏๆด็ญ‰็ง‘็›ฎๆผ”็ปƒ. December 29th, 2025.

[xv] PLA Eastern Theater Command Weibo. ไธœ้ƒจๆˆ˜ๅŒบ็ป„็ป‡่ฝฐ็‚ธๆœบ็ผ–้˜Ÿ่ตดๅฐๅฒ›ไปฅไธœๅผ€ๅฑ•่ฟœๆตทๆˆ˜ๅค‡ๅทก่ˆช. December 29th, 2025.

[xvi] Guo Yuandan and Liu Xuanzun. Type 075 amphibious assault ship joins drills surrounding Taiwan for first time. Global Times. December 29th, 2025.

[xvii] Joseph Wen. https://x.com/JosephWen___/status/2005729323593224444. December 29th, 2025., PLA Eastern Theater Command Weibo. ไธœ้ƒจๆˆ˜ๅŒบๅ‘ๅธƒ#ๅพฎ่ง†้ข‘่ฟ™ไนˆ่ฟ‘้‚ฃไนˆ็พŽ้šๆ—ถๅˆฐๅฐๅŒ—#. December 29th, 2025.

[xviii] PLA Eastern Theater Command Weibo. ไธœ้ƒจๆˆ˜ๅŒบไฝๅฐๅฒ›ๅ—ๅŒ—ไธค็ซฏๅผ€ๅฑ•ๅฏนๆตท็ชๅ‡ปใ€้˜ฒ็ฉบๅๆฝœ็ญ‰็ง‘็›ฎๆผ”็ปƒ. December 30th, 2025.

[xix] Joseph Wen & Taiwan Defense Studies Initiative. https://x.com/JosephWen___/status/2005661342691398111. December 29th, 2025.

[xx] Joseph Wen & Taiwan Defense Studies Initiative. https://x.com/JosephWen___/status/2005661342691398111. December 29th, 2025.

[xxi] Joseph Wen & Taiwan Defense Studies Initiative. https://x.com/JosephWen___/status/2005661342691398111. December 29th, 2025.

[xxii] Joseph Yeh. PLA rockets land inside Taiwan’s 24 nautical mile contiguous zone: MND.ย  Focus Taiwan/CNA. December 30th, 2025.

[xxiii] Taiwan Security Monitor. https://x.com/TaiwanMonitor/status/2006216815442116690. December 30th, 2025.

[xxiv] ROC Military News Agency. ไธญๅ…ฑๆฉŸ่‰ฆ่‡บๆตทๅ‘จ้‚Šๆดปๅ‹•ใ€€ๅœ‹่ปๅšดๅฏ†็›ฃๆŽงๆ‡‰่™•. January 1st, 2026.https://mna.mnd.gov.tw/news/detail/?UserKey=a7500bc9-1570-4fc9-8818-8998d9b695cf

[xxv] Taiwan Security Monitor TAO Statement Tracker https://tsm.schar.gmu.edu/taiwan-affairs-office-the-plas-military-operations-are-a-solemn-warning-to-taiwan-independence-separatist-forces-and-external-interference-forces/

[xxvi] Taiwan Security Monitor on X/Twitter:   https://tsm.schar.gmu.edu/new-arms-sales-for-taiwan-details-and-reactions/

[xxvii] Taiwan Security Monitor on X/Twitter:   https://www.fmprc.gov.cn/fyrbt_673021/jzhsl_673025/202512/t20251229_11789718.shtml

[xxviii]  Taiwan Security Monitor on X/Twitter:   https://x.com/TaiwanMonitor/status/2005869817232867426?s=20

[xxix] Taiwan Security Monitor on X/Twitter:   https://x.com/TaiwanMonitor/status/2005807062735790564?s=20; https://x.com/TaiwanMonitor/status/2005456163249192993?s=20

[xxx] Taiwan Security Monitor on X/Twitter:  https://x.com/TaiwanMonitor/status/2005521133496623314?s=20; https://x.com/TaiwanMonitor/status/2005837836851855481?s=20; https://x.com/TaiwanMonitor/status/2005569169895366874?s=20

[xxxi] Taiwan Security Monitor TAO Statement Tracker https://tsm.schar.gmu.edu/taiwan-affairs-office-the-plas-military-operations-are-a-solemn-warning-to-taiwan-independence-separatist-forces-and-external-interference-forces/

[xxxii] Taiwan Security Monitor TAO Statement Tracker https://tsm.schar.gmu.edu/taiwan-affairs-office-any-country-or-force-that-plays-with-fire-on-the-taiwan-question-will-inevitably-pay-a-price/; https://tsm.schar.gmu.edu/taiwan-affairs-office-any-taiwan-independence-separatist-actions-will-never-be-tolerated-and-will-be-met-with-severe-punishment/

[xxxiii] Taiwan Security Monitor TAO Statement Tracker https://tsm.schar.gmu.edu/taiwan-affairs-office-any-taiwan-independence-separatist-actions-will-never-be-tolerated-and-will-be-met-with-severe-punishment/

[xxxiv] Taiwan Security Monitor TAO Statement Tracker https://tsm.schar.gmu.edu/taiwan-affairs-office-any-taiwan-independence-separatist-actions-will-never-be-tolerated-and-will-be-met-with-severe-punishment/

[xxxv] Ng and Ewe, โ€œTrump Downplays Chinese Military Drills Around Taiwanโ€ BBC, https://www.bbc.com/news/articles/cdxwxkeg9w6o

[xxxvi]US State Department on Justice Mission 2025 from CBS News: โ€œU.S. says China’s military activities near Taiwan “increase tensions unnecessarily” https://www.cbsnews.com/news/china-military-activities-near-taiwan-unnecessarily-raise-tensions-us-says

[xxxvii] https://www.cna.com.tw/news/aopl/202512303004.aspx

[xxxviii] Japan Times: https://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2025/12/31/japan/china-military-exercises-taiwan-japan-europe/

[xxxix] Philippines Government Announcement: https://www.bworldonline.com/the-nation/2026/01/01/721925/philippines-concerned-over-chinas-drills-near-taiwan-says-they-undermine-regional-stability

[xl] Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs Announcement: https://en.mofa.gov.tw/News_Content.aspx?n=1329&s=121415

[xli] German Government Announcement: https://www.auswaertiges-amt.de/en/newsroom/news/military-exercises-china-taiwan-2750712

[xlii] United Kingdom Government Announcement: https://www.gov.uk/government/news/statement-on-chinas-military-drills-december-2025

[xliii] French Government Announcement: https://www.diplomatie.gouv.fr/en/country-files/china/news/article/justice-mission-2025-exercises-around-taiwan-december-30-2025

[xliv]Taiwan Ministry of Foreign Affairs Announcement: https://x.com/MOFA_Taiwan/status/2006273783192297963?s=20

Taiwan, want to stop the gray-zone? Put your money where your mouth is.

Author: Jonathan Walberg


Photo of Hongtai58 released by the Taiwan Coast Guard

The conviction stemming from the severing of Taiwanโ€™s TP3 undersea cable was not merely a local legal success but a demonstration that gray-zone coercion can be countered when ambiguity is met with evidence and enforcement. Gray-zone strategies rely on deniability, repetition, and administrative normalizationโ€”coast-guard pressure, maritime militias, cable interference, and disinformation meant to exhaust institutions and condition the public to view incursions as routine. If left unchallenged, these tactics gradually reshape realities on the ground, shift the burden of proof onto Taipei, and narrow its political and operational options.

The effective response lies less in escalating conventional military power than in sustained investment in attribution, law enforcement, and narrative control. Although most global undersea cable faults are accidental, that very background noise makes persistent surveillance, pattern analysis, and prosecutorial capacity essential. Patrol vessels, sensors, and legal authorities convert suspicion into proof and protests into penalties, raising the cost of coercion at a fraction of the price of advanced fighter aircraft or major combatants.

Partnerships and disciplined transparency further strengthen deterrence. Cooperation with allies, insurers, and port authorities can impose economic and legal consequences on China-linked โ€œshadow fleets,โ€ while selective, evidence-based disclosure undermines disinformation without fueling panic. The TP3 verdict signaled that Taiwanโ€™s maritime domain is governed by rules and consequences; sustaining that message requires consistently funding the institutions that patrol, document, prosecute, and communicate. If Taipei seeks fewer gray-zone tests, it must resource the people and tools that confront them every day.

Read at Small Wars Journal.

How Japan Can Unlock US Munitions Bottlenecks for Taiwan

Author: Jonathan Walberg


The guided missile cruiser USS Princeton (CG 59) launches an AGM-84 Harpoon Block II missile at the Naval Air Systems Command Sea Test Range off the coast of Southern California, Sept. 10, 2009. The Harpoon Block II is one of several arms systems sold but not yet delivered to Taiwan. Image Credit: U.S. Navy

U.S. arms deliveries to Taiwan are being slowed less by politics than by production and regulatory constraints. Bottlenecks in munitions and critical subcomponents (such as rocket motors, seekers, radomes, and launch hardware) are limiting output on U.S. production lines. Because those same lines support foreign military sales to multiple allies, delays to Taiwan also push deliveries for other partners further into the future.

Current export control rules, particularly the International Traffic in Arms Regulations (ITAR), restrict the ability of close allies to help relieve these industrial chokepoints, even when they have available capacity. The 2024 AUKUS ITAR framework with the United Kingdom and Australia shows that it is possible to reduce regulatory friction while maintaining strong security safeguards. A similarly narrow, mission-driven arrangement with Japan could allow co-production of low-sensitivity munitions subassemblies that are currently constraining U.S. output, without transferring sensitive technologies or design authority.

Read the full article here.

Donโ€™t Sweep Minesweepers Under the Rug: Americaโ€™s Critical Naval Vulnerability

Authors: Ethan Connell & Jonathan Walberg


TSM Research Team Leadย Ethan Connellย and Associate Directorย Jonathan Walbergย write about the urgent threat facing the United States Navy. In it, they talk about the looming mine threat and the role of minesweeping capabilities in modern conflict. They note the exigency of this problem, and illustrate a path forward to addressing this issue. The Center for Maritime Strategyโ€™sย Maritime Operations Center. May 20th, 2025.

Read the full piece here.

How the Philippines Can Counter Chinaโ€™s South China Sea Aggression

Authors: Jonathan Walberg & Ethan Connell


TSM Associate Directorย Jonathan Walbergย and Research Team Leadย Ethan Connellย write about how the Philippinesโ€™ fragmented maritime response to Chinaโ€™s aggression in the South China Sea undermines its sovereignty while allowing Beijing to control the narrative and test U.S. resolve.

Read the full piece here.

Left on Read: Americaโ€™s Taiwan Warning Crisis

Authors: Noah Reed & Jonathan Walberg


TSM Research Director Noah Reedย andย Associate Director Jonathan Walbergย assess the risk of miscommunication between Taipei and Washington.

Overinflated: Chinaโ€™s Balloon Threats to Taiwan

Authors: Jonathan Walberg & Noah Reed


TSM Associate Director Jonathan Walbergย andย Research Director Noah Reedย discuss the 2023-2024 balloon overflights of Taiwan.

Read the full piece here.